The FTC Just Blew Up Brand Safety

Good morning, it's James here. The federal government just told the three largest ad holding companies that the way they've been defining "brand safety" for the past six years was illegal. If your media team uses WPP, Publicis, or Dentsu, you need to read what follows.

(Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here.)

The Lead: The FTC Just Blew Up Brand Safety

On Wednesday, the FTC and eight state attorneys general filed against WPP, Publicis, and Dentsu, alleging the three holding companies colluded through the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) to impose common brand safety standards across the digital ad industry (ppc.land).

The specifics: starting in 2018, the agencies used GARM and the 4As' Advertiser Protection Bureau to create a shared "Brand Safety Floor" that categorically excluded certain publishers from ad revenue. In 2022, "misinformation" was added as a blanket exclusion category. The FTC alleges third-party raters like NewsGuard and Global Disinformation Index operationalized these exclusions in ways that targeted politically disfavored content rather than genuinely harmful material (MediaPost).

FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson did not mince words: "The ad agencies' brand-safety conspiracy turned competition in the market for ad-buying services on its head."

The proposed settlement permanently bans all three from entering agreements that set common brand safety standards or restrict advertising based on politically motivated criteria. WPP's response was notably careful: "We are pleased to finalize this agreement with the FTC which reflects our existing and ongoing commitment to provide our clients with unbiased advice."

Why CMOs should care: If your agency manages your brand safety settings, you need to understand what just changed. The universal blocklists and floor standards that GARM created are now legally void. That means brand safety is no longer something your holding company decides for you by default. It is now, explicitly, your decision. That is both a freedom and a responsibility. CMOs who were passively accepting agency defaults now need an active, documented brand safety policy that reflects their own risk tolerance, not an industry consortium's political judgment.

The take: GARM was always a blunt instrument pretending to be precision tooling. The premise was sensible: brands should not fund harmful content. But the execution drifted from safety into editorial gatekeeping, and the FTC called it what it was. The brands that come out ahead here are the ones who already knew what they stood for and didn't outsource that judgment. If your brand safety strategy was "whatever my agency's default list says," this is your wake-up call to own it.

By The Numbers

$243.46 billion versus $239.54 billion.

That is eMarketer's projection for Meta and Google's 2026 ad revenue, respectively. For the first time in the history of digital advertising, Meta is on pace to surpass Google as the world's largest ad platform (Marketing Dive).

The gap is not a rounding error. Meta's growth rate is accelerating (24.1%, up from 22.1% last year) while Google's holds flat at 11.9%. Meta now commands 26.8% of worldwide ad spend to Google's 26.4%.

What is driving it? Advantage+ and AI-generated creative are compressing the distance between "running Meta ads" and "running Meta ads well." Reels is pulling in spend that used to go to TikTok and YouTube Shorts. And Meta's measurement improvements, including this week's one-click Conversions API, keep lowering the floor for smaller advertisers to see results.

The implications are structural. For a generation of marketers, "digital advertising" meant Google first, everything else second. That mental model is now outdated. If your media mix still treats Google as the default and Meta as the supplement, you are allocating against a world that no longer exists.

The Reading List

• "Google Is Replacing Dynamic Search Ads With AI Max" Search Engine Land breaks down Google's April 15 announcement killing DSA. Voluntary migration now, forced migration in September. If you run Dynamic Search Ads, your window to control this transition is shrinking.

• "This Is a Very Good Ad. And Coca-Cola Should Never Have Made It." Mark Ritson on why Coca-Cola's Hilltop remake, however well-executed, was the wrong call. System1 data on 50,000+ ads shows creative doesn't wear out. Marketing teams do. Read this before you brief your next nostalgia campaign.

• "A Closer Look at OpenAI's Ads Manager" Digiday takes OpenAI's ad platform for a spin and finds CPM-only pricing, bare-bones targeting, and no real measurement. The company projects ads will be 36% of revenue by 2030. The gap between ambition and infrastructure is staggering.

• "Meta Upgrades Pixel and Conversions API" Meta's new one-click CAPI removes the technical barrier that kept smaller advertisers from server-side tracking. Advertisers using CAPI see 17.8% lower cost per result. If your team has been putting this off, the excuse just disappeared.

One More Thing

April 15 was a busy day for reasons beyond taxes. Google killed a 15-year-old ad format. Meta made its best measurement tool free. The FTC told the holding companies their collective brand safety framework was anticompetitive. And eMarketer published data showing the company everyone counted as No. 2 is now No. 1.

All in one day. The ground is shifting faster than quarterly planning cycles can absorb. The CMOs who win from here are the ones building organizations that can move at the speed of the platforms they depend on.

See you next Monday. Stay sharp out there.

—James